Review




Structured Review

plexon inc linear electrode array plexon 24 channels
Linear Electrode Array Plexon 24 Channels, supplied by plexon inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/linear electrode array plexon 24 channels/product/plexon inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
linear electrode array plexon 24 channels - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars

Images



Similar Products

90
plexon inc linear electrode array plexon 24 channels
Linear Electrode Array Plexon 24 Channels, supplied by plexon inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/linear electrode array plexon 24 channels/product/plexon inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
linear electrode array plexon 24 channels - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
plexon inc 24 channel linear electrode array plexon u-probe
Awake-behaving experimental paradigm and <t>electrode</t> depth registration. a. Head-fixed preparation. Ferrets were implanted with a metal post that was attached to the skull and held fixed during awake-behaving neurophysiological experiments. The ferret performed the task while we recorded from primary auditory cortex (A1) using a 24 <t>channel</t> <t>linear</t> electrode <t>array</t> (Plexon U-probe). b. Pure-tone detection task. Two ferrets were trained to do a conditioned avoidance Go/No-Go pure-tone detection task. In each trial of the task, the animal heard a sequence of reference noises followed by a pure-tone target. Reference noises were “Go” signals, during which the animal was free to lick a waterspout. Upon detecting the target (the “No-Go” signal), the animal stopped licking the water spout to avoid a mild shock. The target frequency was different for each experiment. c. Electrode depth-registration. The left panel shows an example of how the layer 2/3 (L2/3) vs. layers 4-6 (L4-6) border (dashed line) was computed for a single penetration of the 24 channel linear electrode array in A1. Local field potential (LFP) responses to 100 ms tones were used to find a common marker of depth across penetrations (i.e., for depth registration). Registration began by first identifying the electrode with the shortest LFP response latency (Eτ, white square), then finding the LFP waveform correlation coefficients (ρ) between Eτ and all other electrodes in the same penetration. The border between the first neighboring electrode pair with positive and negative correlation coefficients defined the L2/3 vs. L4-6 border , , , – . Laminar profiles were averaged across penetrations after first aligning to the border. The right panel shows the average depth-registered LFP laminar profile in response to 100 ms tones.
24 Channel Linear Electrode Array Plexon U Probe, supplied by plexon inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/24 channel linear electrode array plexon u-probe/product/plexon inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
24 channel linear electrode array plexon u-probe - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Awake-behaving experimental paradigm and electrode depth registration. a. Head-fixed preparation. Ferrets were implanted with a metal post that was attached to the skull and held fixed during awake-behaving neurophysiological experiments. The ferret performed the task while we recorded from primary auditory cortex (A1) using a 24 channel linear electrode array (Plexon U-probe). b. Pure-tone detection task. Two ferrets were trained to do a conditioned avoidance Go/No-Go pure-tone detection task. In each trial of the task, the animal heard a sequence of reference noises followed by a pure-tone target. Reference noises were “Go” signals, during which the animal was free to lick a waterspout. Upon detecting the target (the “No-Go” signal), the animal stopped licking the water spout to avoid a mild shock. The target frequency was different for each experiment. c. Electrode depth-registration. The left panel shows an example of how the layer 2/3 (L2/3) vs. layers 4-6 (L4-6) border (dashed line) was computed for a single penetration of the 24 channel linear electrode array in A1. Local field potential (LFP) responses to 100 ms tones were used to find a common marker of depth across penetrations (i.e., for depth registration). Registration began by first identifying the electrode with the shortest LFP response latency (Eτ, white square), then finding the LFP waveform correlation coefficients (ρ) between Eτ and all other electrodes in the same penetration. The border between the first neighboring electrode pair with positive and negative correlation coefficients defined the L2/3 vs. L4-6 border , , , – . Laminar profiles were averaged across penetrations after first aligning to the border. The right panel shows the average depth-registered LFP laminar profile in response to 100 ms tones.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Laminar profile of task-related plasticity in ferret primary auditory cortex

doi: 10.1101/354910

Figure Lengend Snippet: Awake-behaving experimental paradigm and electrode depth registration. a. Head-fixed preparation. Ferrets were implanted with a metal post that was attached to the skull and held fixed during awake-behaving neurophysiological experiments. The ferret performed the task while we recorded from primary auditory cortex (A1) using a 24 channel linear electrode array (Plexon U-probe). b. Pure-tone detection task. Two ferrets were trained to do a conditioned avoidance Go/No-Go pure-tone detection task. In each trial of the task, the animal heard a sequence of reference noises followed by a pure-tone target. Reference noises were “Go” signals, during which the animal was free to lick a waterspout. Upon detecting the target (the “No-Go” signal), the animal stopped licking the water spout to avoid a mild shock. The target frequency was different for each experiment. c. Electrode depth-registration. The left panel shows an example of how the layer 2/3 (L2/3) vs. layers 4-6 (L4-6) border (dashed line) was computed for a single penetration of the 24 channel linear electrode array in A1. Local field potential (LFP) responses to 100 ms tones were used to find a common marker of depth across penetrations (i.e., for depth registration). Registration began by first identifying the electrode with the shortest LFP response latency (Eτ, white square), then finding the LFP waveform correlation coefficients (ρ) between Eτ and all other electrodes in the same penetration. The border between the first neighboring electrode pair with positive and negative correlation coefficients defined the L2/3 vs. L4-6 border , , , – . Laminar profiles were averaged across penetrations after first aligning to the border. The right panel shows the average depth-registered LFP laminar profile in response to 100 ms tones.

Article Snippet: We studied the laminar profile of rapid task-related plasticity by recording from a 24 channel linear electrode array (Plexon U-probe) inserted through the dura, orthogonal to the surface of A1, in two ferrets that were performing an auditory detection task ( ).

Techniques: Sequencing, Marker